In this article, we're comparing Apple computers running Mac OS X - no hackintoshes to be found here - and computers running the Windows operating system. These days the two are similar enough that it often comes down to the kind of computer you prefer - or can afford.īefore we get started, we need to establish some definitions. Although the hottest days in the flame wars between the two platforms seem to have passed, both platforms have dyed-in-the-wool supporters. The conflict between Apple supporters and Windows fans raged on college campuses, social networks and internet message boards. It used to be that if you were to wade into the middle of any large technology conference and shout out "Macs are whack" or "Apple rules, Microsoft stinks," you could start a riot.
With my original comment, I only wanted to show that the build in the article was unoptimized in terms of performance per dollar.Are you team Mac or team PC? Future Publishing/Getty Images I understand the frustrating crashes that sometimes happen with DaVinci Resolve on Windows (which I've also experienced while having barely used Resolve), and I understand how powerful Apple's processors are-especially with video editing. I'd like to reiterate that I have nothing against Apple's products if they work better for you. Switching the 6600 XT for a 3060 would only bring the price up to €1890 ().
Puget Systems says 8GB of VRAM is enough for a 4K timeline resolution (), but you're likely right that the 3060 is faster here since DaVinci Resolve currently favors Nvidia GPUs. > "the original configuration had a 12GB - more RAM is better for video editing." My point was that the build from the article isn't the most performance possible when the budget limit is the price of a Mac Studio. I never said that the point is to get a computer for the price of a Mac Studio. more> "the point isn't to get a computer for the price of the Mac Studio" Also, again, the point isn't to get a computer for. Ivan Petkov, Now show me that build in Euro prices.
0 kommentar(er)
